Credit: Instagram
Since news broke that Don’t Be Tardy alum Kim Zolciak‘s 15-year-old son Kroy “KJ” Jagger Biermann was arrested for an alleged sexual assault, lots of new information has continued to emerge.
One shocking piece was that KJ was accused of having sex with an underage family member after disturbing videos were found on his cell phone.
Page Six has now revealed that KJ’s phone was actually part of a divorce court issue between Kim, 48, and his father, Kroy Biermann, 41.
According to the report, Kim claimed in a motion for an emergency hearing on February 18, 2025, that Kroy had taken possession of their kids’ cellular devices and limited her access to the kids after he discovered something.
What Kroy discovered is redacted from the documents that the public is privy to.
Additionally, Kim filed a motion for an in-camera inspection, which, Page Six notes, is largely redacted, so that a judge could privately review evidence the same day.
Kim’s filing did not specify what she wanted reviewed, but a filing on February 21, 2025, made reference to the order regarding inspection of Kim and Kroy’s “eldest child’s cellular telephone, and the data thereon, which had been the subject of the in-camera inspection motion.”
A Motion for Emergency Hearing that Kim filed on February 7, 2025, stated that Kroy told a court-appointed mental health professional, who was neutral, about something he had discovered that is redacted from the filing.
“In protecting the best interests of the children, Mother will not put into this public pleading what is alleged to be on REDACTED,” the motion claims.
It went on to state that Kroy “began battening down the hatches,” noting he “unilaterally directed Mother that she would no longer have parenting time with any of the children, took possession of the children’s phones, and prohibited the children from communicating with Mother.”
“Mother has had extremely limited parenting time, and Mother has grave concerns for the children’s safety and wellbeing, as well as the preservation of evidence which may be (or may have been) stored REDACTED,” the filing adds.
Both Kim and Kroy agreed that their attorneys would seek an order that would govern the inspection and handling of their “eldest child’s cellular telephone, and the data thereon,” which a document claimed was the subject of the in-camera inspection motion that Kim had filed on February 18.
The court ended up sealing documents related to the matter the following month, and anything mentioning the results of the inspection is not publicly available.
Lawyers and representatives for KJ, Kim, and Kroy have not commented on the latest report to date.
The outlet did note that they did not confirm that there was any connection between the report about disturbing videos being found on KJ’s phone and the divorce filings. They also claimed they did not confirm whether Kim and Kroy knew anything about the contents on KJ’s phone at the time of the filings.